Article | . 2019 Vol. 37, Issue. 2
Assessment of Heading Performance and Inflorescence Visibility in Miscanthus sinensis Cultivars

Department of Golf Course Management, Korea Golf University1
Department of Biological Science and Technology, Graduate School of Yonsei University2

2019.. 290:303


Miscanthus sinensis (Poaceae) cultivars have great values as ornamental grasses and adapt well to various environmental conditions. To assess the inflorescence visibility of seven popular Miscanthus cultivars (‘Gold Breeze’, ‘Strictus’, ‘Morning Light’, ‘Variegatus’, ‘Gracillimus’, ‘Kleine Fontäne’, and ‘Common’), the heading performance and morphological characteristics were analyzed. The test cultivars were transplanted and cultivated on research plots in 2013 and data were collected from July 2017 to February 2018. Among the six cultivars, except ‘Gold Breeze’, which had not bloomed during the research period, ‘Kleine Fontäne’ showed the longest heading period and the highest peduncle density. Heading patterns were classified in the early and the late heading patterns. The early heading pattern cultivars (‘Kleine Fontäne’, ‘Common’, and ‘Strictus’) had a high weekly heading rate (WHR), and reached later heading peak time with low mean heading rate (MHR). However, the late heading pattern cultivars (‘Variegatus’, ‘Gracillimus’, and ‘Morning Light’) had high WHR at the beginning of the heading initiation and reached earlier heading peak time with high MHR. The changes of inflorescence stage were classified into the flowering season (stage 1), the seed maturation (stage 2), and the seed shatter stages (stage 3). The inflorescence colors were expressed with a reddish (‘Strictus’, ‘Morning Light’, ‘Variegatus’, ‘Gracillimus’, and ‘Common’) and a yellow-greenish (‘Kleine Fontäne’) color in stage 1. The color difference value (ΔE*ab) was greater at stage 1 and stage 2; however, ΔE*ab was decreased in stage 3 compared with the reference inflorescence color of ‘Common’. The morphological characteristics of inflorescences were significantly different among the cultivars, such as the plant height, stem length, dissociation index, length, width, length/width ratio, raceme density, and spikelet density. On the assessment of inflorescence visibility, the morphological characteristics showed a decisive component in ‘Common’, ‘Strictus’, ‘Variegatus’, and ‘Gracillimus’; on the other hand, the heading characteristics were more influential on visibility in ‘Kleine Fontäne’ and ‘Morning Light’. These results suggest that the inflorescence visibility of Miscanthus cultivars was determined by various factors of the heading and morphological characteristics of inflorescence.

1. An GH, Kim JK, Moon YH, Cha YL, Yoon YM, Koo BC, Park KG (2013) A now genotype of Geodae-Uksae 1, identified by growth characteristics and a specific SCAR marker. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 36:695-703. doi:10.1007/s00449-013-0893-7  

2. An GH, Um KR, Lee JH, Jang YH, Lee JE, Yu GD, Cha YL, Moon YH, Ahn JW (2015) Flowering patterns of germplasms in Korea. Korean J Crop Sci 60:510-517. doi:10.7740/kjcs.2015.60.4.510  

3. Association of Official Seed Analysts (AOSA) (1990) Rules for testing seeds. Seed Technol J 12:1-112  

4. Bonin CL, Mutegi E, Snow AA, Miriti M, Chang H, Heaton EA (2017) Improved feedstock option or invasive risk? Comparing establishment and productivity of fertile × giganteus to . Bioenergy Res 10:317-328. doi:10.1007/s12155-016-9808-1  

5. Chen L, Ryu JS, Lee JS (2016) A study on analysis of colors applied to façade of modern commercial avenues in Korea and China. J Korean Soc Color Stud 30:5-17. doi:10.17289/jkscs.30.2.201605.05  

6. Clifton-Brown JC, Lewandowski I, Andersson B, Basch G, Christian DG, Kjeldsen JB, Jorgensen U, Mortensen JV, Riche AB, et al (2001) Performance of 15 genotypes at five sites in Europe. Agron J 93:1013-1019. doi:10.2134/agronj2001.9351013x  

7. Darke R (2007) The encyclopedia of grasses for the livable landscapes. Timber Press, Portland, OR, USA, pp 13-59  

8. Davidson CG, Gobin SM (1998) Evaluation of ornamental grasses for the northern great plains. J Environ Hortic 16:218-229  

9. Dougherty RF, Quinn LD, Endres AB, Voigt TB, Barney JN (2014) Natural history survey of the ornamental grass in the introduced range. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 7:113-120. doi:10.1614/IPSM-D-13-00037.1  

10. Dougherty RF, Quinn LD, Voigt TB, Barney JN (2015) Response of naturalized and ornamental biotypes of to soil-moisture and shade stress. Northeastern Nat 22:372-386. doi:10.1656/045.022.0210  

11. Gao H, Liu J (2005) The ornamental grass species and their ornamental value and utilization. Grassland Turf 3:13-16  

12. Greef JM, Deuter M, Jung C, Schondelmaier J (1997) Genetic diversity of European species revealed by AFLP fingerprinting. Genet Resour Crop Evol 44:185-195. doi:10.1023/A:1008693214629  

13. Gunnell JD, Jerry LG, Richard MA (2015) Ornamental grasses in the landscape, A guide for the Intermountain West. University of Utah Extension, UT, USA  

14. Jensen E, Farrar K, Jones ST, Hastings A, Donnison I, Brown JC (2011) Characterization of flowering time diversity in species. Glob. Change Biol Bioenergy 3:387-400. doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01097.x  

15. Jensen E, Robson P, Norris J, Cookson A, Farrar K, Donnison I, Clifton-Brown J (2013) Flowering induction in the bioenergy grass is a quantitative short-day response, whilst delayed flowering under long days increases biomass accumulation. J Exp Bot 66:541-552. doi:10.1093/jxb/ers346  

16. Kim JM, Kim KS (2008) A study on floral color groups and ranges for cut flowers using by colorimeter. J Korean Soc Color Stud pp 84-88  

17. Kim KD, Kim YJ, Lee JM, Lee JH, Joo YK (2013) Seed treatment and plug production of ornamental grasses (Gramineae spp.). Weed Turf Sci 2:376-380. doi:10.5660/WTS.2013.2.4.376  

18. Kim KD, Lee JH, Joo YK (2015) Spring green-up and winter leaf discoloration of three ornamental grasses (Gramineae spp.). Weed Turf Sci 4:49-57. doi:10.5660/WTS.2015.4.1.49  

19. Kim YS, Choi SR (2015) Analysis of change in plants color according to temperature and humidity of wall greening in the eco plaza of the new government office building of Seoul. J Korean Soc Color Stud 29:49-58. doi:10.17289/jkscs.29.4.201511.49  

20. Kim YS, Seo JH (2013) A comparative analysis on color by lighting of patterns in Begoniaceae commercially distributed in Korea. J Korean Soc Color Stud 27:5-11. doi:10.17289/jkscs.27.1.201302.5  

21. Korea Forest Service (KFS) (2015) Illustrated grasses of Korea. Jinhan M&B Inc., Seoul, Korea, pp 2-543  

22. Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) (2018) Weather Information. Accessed 1 March 2018  

23. Korea Nation Arboretum (KNA) (2018) Korean Plant Names Index (KPNI). Accessed 12 March 2018  

24. Lee CB (2003) Coloured flora of Korea. Hyang Mun Sa Publishing Co., Seoul, Korea, pp 434  

25. Lee JP, Kim DH (2005) Improvement of green-up zoysiagrass and cool-season grass during early spring in Korea. Korean Turfgrass Sci 19:103-113  

26. Lee JS, Moon EB (2015) Analysis on the foliar color of street trees in residential area of Gyeonggi-do province. J Korean Soc Color Stud 29:5-16. doi:10.17289/jkscs.29.4.201511.05  

27. Meyer MH (2004) : Ornamental and invasive grass. HortScience 39:792. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.39.4.792B  

28. Meyer MH, Tchida CL (1999) Anderss. Produces viable seed in four USDA hardness zones. J Environ Hortic 17:137-140  

29. Missouri Botanical Garden (MBG) (2018) MBG Plant Finder. Accessed 12 March 2018  

30. Moon EB, Choi HJ (2014) A study on the classification criteria of landscape for local color collection. J Korean Soc Design Cult 20:285-298  

31. Quinn M, Macleod C (2003) Grasses scapes: Gardening with ornamental grasses. Ball Publishing, Batavia, IL, USA, pp 34-35  

32. Rural Development Administration (RDA) (2012) Standard book on research, investigation and analysis of agricultural science and technology. RDA, Korea, pp 3-405  

33. SAS institute (2016) SAS/STAT User’s guide version 9.4. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC, USA  

34. Seo JH (2014). Analysis on color change by seasonal in greenhouse cut rose. J Korean Soc Color Stud 28:125-131. doi:10.17289/jkscs. 28.4.201411.125  

35. Smith LS, Fellowes MDE (2015) The influence of plant species number on productivity, ground coverage and floral performance in grass-free lawns. Landscape Ecol Eng 11:249-257. doi:10.1007/s11355-014-0264-9  

36. Sohn KH, Kwon HJ (2008) Study of dried Korean native plants using for floral cluster. Flower Res J 16:266-274  

37. Song YS, Lee JE, Moon YH, Yu GD, Choi IS, Cha YL, Kim KS (2018) Changes of morphological and growth characteristics collected germplasm in Korea. Weed Turf Sci 7:22-34. doi:10.5660/WTS.2018.7.1.22  

38. Thetford M, Norcini JG, Ballard B, Aldrich JH (2009) Ornamental landscape performance of native and nonnative grasses under low-input conditions. HortTechnology 19:267-285. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.19.2.267  

39. U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2018) Natural Resources Conservation Service Plant Database. Accessed 12 March 2018  

40. US Patent (2011) plant named ‘Gold Breeze’. US PP22,311 P2  

41. Wilson SB, Knox GW (2006) Landscape performance, flowering, and seed viability of 15 Japanese silver grass cultivars grown in Northern and Southern Florida. HortTechnology 16:686-693. doi:10.21273/HORTTECH.16.4.0686  

42. Wilson SB, Knox GW (2009) Landscape performance, flowering, and seed viability of 10 green fountain grass alternative grown in Northern and Southern Florida. HortTechnology 19:471-476. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.19.2.471  

43. Wu J, Teng W, Wang Q (2006) Evaluation of ornamental characters of introduced drought-tolerant perennial ornamental grasses in spring. Hua Bei Nong Xue Bao 1:028