Article | . 2019 Vol. 37, Issue. 2
Yield Gap Analysis of Sweet Pepper in Protected Cultivations Between Korea and The Netherlands



Department of Horticulture and Product Physiology, Wageningen University & Research Centre1
Department of Horticulture, Chonnam National University2




2019.. 219:226


PDF XML




The Korean production of highly valuable horticultural crops is less than 50% of the production in The Netherlands. The production in Korea can be improved by yield gap analyses between a Dutch and a Korean grower. Fruit set, number of fruits, production of sweet pepper, and climate data of a Dutch commercial grower were measured and compared with a Korean commercial grower. Greenhouse type and cultivar were same in both countries. The Korean grower produced faster and more fruits after planting. However, with the increase in daily radiation later in the growing season, the Dutch grower harvested more sweet peppers per week, which results in a higher final production. Consequently, the difference in yield between growers was 10 kg·m-2. Low radiation along with large leaves and the relatively higher number of fruits for the young plants resulted in a low source-to-sink ratio (SSR), which causes abortion of reproductive organs. The fruit load varied between the two countries; however, it does not explain the factors limiting the yield. SSR can predict the onset of fruiting, and an SSR above 0.5 suggested fruit onset. An SSR below this threshold value indicates light limitations. The SSR limits the fruit set, possibly due to high fruit loads and high vegetative sink strength. In the last part of the growing season, other factors could have played a role in the lower fruit set, since the SSR was mainly above 1. To improve yield, the Korean grower needs to know how to manipulate the vegetative and generative plant balance based on weather conditions, irrigation management, and plant growth and developmental rate.



1. Abdel-Mawgoud AMR, El-Abd SO, Böhme M, Sassine YN, Abou-Hadid AF (2008) Weekly fruit production of sweet pepper in relation to plant fruit load manipulation. Acta Hortic 779:439-446. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.779.55  

2. Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J (2012) World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. FAO, Rome, Italy  

3. Aloni, B., Karni L, Zaidman Z, Schaffer AA (1996) Changes of carbohydrates in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) flowers in relation to their abscission under different shading regimes. Ann Bot 78:163-168. doi:10.1006/anbo.1996.0109  

4. Bakker JC (1988) The effects of temperature on flowering, fruit set and fruit development of glasshouse sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 64:313-320. doi:10.1080/14620316.1989.11515959  

5. CBS (2018) Vegetable; yield and cultivated area per kind of vegetable. Available via https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/en/dataset/ 37738ENG/table?dl=AB8B Accessed 27 June 2018  

6. Cockshull KE (1985) Greenhouse climate and crop response. Acta Hortic 174:285-292. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.1985.174.36  

7. De Koning ANM (1994) Development and dry matter distribution in glasshouse tomato: a quantitative approach. PhD Diss., Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands  

8. Dueck TA, Grashoff C, Broekhuijsen G, Marcelis LFM (2006) Efficiency of light energy used by leaves Situated in different levels of a sweet pepper canopy. Acta Hortic 711:201-206. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.711.25  

9. Grashoff K, Stanghellini C, Kempkes F, Elings A (2014) Energiebesparing door bladplukken bij paprika: haalbaarheidsstudie op basis van modellen. Wageningen, The Netherlands  

10. Heuvelink E (1989) Influence of day and night temperature on the growth of young tomato plants. Sci Hortic 38:11-22. doi:10.1016/ 0304-4238(89)90015-0  

11. Heuvelink E (1996) Dry matter partitioning in tomato: validation of a dynamic simulation model. Ann Bot 77:71-80. doi:10.1006/anbo. 1996.0009  

12. Heuvelink E, Lee JH, Buiskool R PM, Ortega L (2002) Light on cut chrysanthemum: measurement and simulation of crop growth and yield. Acta Hortic 580:197-202. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.580.25  

13. Heuvelink E, Marcelis LFM (1996) Influence of assimilate supply on leaf formation in sweet pepper and tomato. J Hortic Sci Biotech 71:405-414. doi:10.1080/14620316.1996.11515421  

14. Higashide T, Heuvelink E (2009) Physiological and morphological changes over the past 50 years in yield components in tomato. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 134:460-465. doi:10.2134/agronj2000.921152x  

15. Jeong WJ, Lee JH, Kim HC, Bae JH (2009a) Dry matter production, distribution and yield of sweet pepper grown under glasshouse and plastic greenhouse in korea. Korean J Bio-Environ Control 18: 258-265 (in Korean)  

16. Jeong WJ, Myoung DJ, Lee JH (2009b) Comparison of climatic conditions of sweet peppers’s greenhouse between Korea and The Netherlands. Korean J Bio-Environ Control 18:244-252 (in Korean)  

17. Kim EJ, Lee SH, Lee JH (2013) Effects of the high pressure sodium lamp lighting on the dynamics of growth and dry mass partitioning in sweet pepper plant. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 31:565-572. doi:10.7235/hort.2013.13037 (in Korean)  

18. MAFEA (2018) Greenhouse status and production for vegetable crops in 2017. Available via www.mafra.go.kr/bbs/mafra/71/233772/ download.do (in Korean) Accessed 27 June 2018  

19. Marcelis LFM (1993) Fruit growth and biomass allocation ot the fruits in cucumber. 1. effect of fruit load and temperature. Sci Hortic 54:107-121. doi:10.1016/0304-4238(93)90059-Y  

20. Marcelis LFM, Heuvelink E, Baan Hofman-Eijer LR, Den Bakker J, Xue LB (2004) Flower and fruit abortion in sweet pepper in relation to source and sink strength. J Exp Bot 55:2261-2268. doi:10.1093/jxb/erh245  

21. Montero, JI (2006) Evaporative cooling in greenhouses: Effect on microclimate, water use efficiency, and plant response. Acta Hortic 719:373-384. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2006.719.42  

22. Nederhoff EM, Houter B (2009) Plant management for generative or vegetative steering. Pract Hydroponics & Greenh (March/April), pp 51-54  

23. Nederhoff EM, Van Uffelen JAM (1988) Effect of continuous and intermittent carbon dioxide enrichment on fruit set and yield of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Neth J Agric Sci 36:109-217  

24. Rylski I., Spigelman M (1986) Effect of shading on plant development, yield and fruit quality of sweet pepper grown under conditions of high temperature and radiation. Sci Hortic 29:31-35. doi:10.1016/0304-4238(86)90028-2  

25. Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL (2011) Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:20260-20264. doi:10.1073/pnas.1116437108  

26. Van Ittersum MK, Cassman KG, Grassini P, Wolf J, Tittonell P, Hochman Z (2013) Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance-A review. Field Crops Res 143:4-17. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.009  

27. Wubs AM (2010). Towards stochastic simulation of crop yield: a case study of fruit set in sweet pepper. PhD. Diss., Wageningen University, The Netherlands, p 149  

28. Wubs AM, Heuvelink E, Marcelis LFM (2009a) Abortion of reproductive organs in sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L .): a review. J Hortic Sci Biot 84:467-475. doi:10.1080/14620316.2009.11512550  

29. Wubs AM, Ma Y, Heuvelink E, Marcelis LFM (2009b) Genetic differences in fruit-set patterns are determined by differences in fruit sink strength and a source:sink threshold for fruit set. Ann Bot 104:957-964. doi:10.1093/aob/mcp181