Article | . 2017 Vol. 35, Issue. 5
Association of Floral Bud and Anther Size with Microspore Developmental Stage in Campari Tomato



Department of Forest Resources, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University1
Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University2




2017.. 608:617


PDF XML




Successful anther/microspore culture largely depends on the use of microspores at appropriate developmental stages at the time of culture, which can be specific for each plant species and genotype. This study was carried out to determine the correlation between morphological characteristics, namely floral bud (FB) length and width and anther length, and specific microspore developmental stages in Campari tomato. FBs ranging from 3.55 mm to 18.38 mm were collected, for which FB diameter and anther length were quantified. Furthermore, the developmental stage of microspores contained within these FBs were observed and recorded. The study revealed a strong positive correlation between each size parameters and the progression of microspore development. Moreover, the strongest correlation was observed between anther length and microspore development, indicating that this parameter was more suitable to predict the microspore developmental stage than the FB size parameters. The study also showed wide and overlapping ranges of FB lengths/diameters and anther lengths for specific microspore developmental stages. Subsequent histological observation revealed that this was the result of microspores at multiple developmental stages within a single anther. Moreover, microspores located in the middle of anthers were at a more advanced developmental stage compared to that of microspores at either anther extremity. The results of this study can be readily applied in the collection of Campari tomato FBs/anthers that harbor microspores at particular developmental stages for anther/microspore culture or for further tissue–specific developmental studies. Also, the technique described here can be applied for similar applications in other plant species and genotypes.



1. Adhikari PB, Yoon CS, Kang WH (2016) Callus induction and shoot regeneration of commercial tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum)through anther culture. Acta Hortic 1142:389-394. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1142.59  

2. Al-Ashkar IM (2013) Anther culture response and salt tolerance in some wheat genotypes. Ann Agric Sci 58:139-145. doi:10.1016/j.aoas.2013.07.017  

3. Bal U, Abak K (2007) Haploidy in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.): a critical review. Euphytica 158:1-9. doi:10.1007/s10681-007-9427-1  

4. Barroso PA, Rego MM, Rego ER, Soares WS (2015) Embryogenesis in the anthers of different ornamental pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) genotypes. Genet Mol Res 14:13349-13363. doi:10.4238/2015.October.26.32  

5. Brasileiro ACR, Willadin o L, Carvalheira GG, Guerra M (1999) Callus induction and plant regeneration of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv. IPA 5) via anther culture. Ciênc Rural 29:619-623. doi:10.1590/S0103-84781999000400008  

6. Germanà MA (2011) Anther culture for haploid and doubled haploid production. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult104:283-300.doi:10.1007/s11240-010-9852-z  

7. Ghaemi M, Sarrafi A, Barthou H, Alibert G (1993) Genetic variability for anther culture responses in tetraploid and hexaploid wheat species. Cereal Res Commun 21:231-237  

8. Gresshoff PM, Doy CH (1972) Development and differentiation of haploid Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Planta 107:161-170.doi:10.1007/bf00387721  

9. Ivers DR, Palmer RG, Fehr WR (1974) Anther culture in soybeans. Crop Sci 14:891-893. doi:10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400060035x  

10. Johansen DA (1940) Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, USA  

11. Khan MMR, Hasnunnahar M, Iwayoshi M, Ogura-Tsujita Y, Isshiki S (2015) Pollen degeneration in three functional male-sterile lines of eggplant with the wild Solanum cytoplasms. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 56:350-357. doi:10.1007/s13580-015-0015-3  

12. Lauxen MdS, Kaltchuk-Santos E, Hu Cy, Callegari-Jacques SM, Bodanese-Zanettini MH (2003) Association between floral bud size and developmental stage in soybean microspores. Braz Arch Biol Technol 46:515-520. doi:10.1590/S1516-89132003000400004   

13. Mahmood Ibrahim A, Binti Kayat F, Ermiena Surya Mat Hussin Z, Susanto D, Ariffulah M (2014) Determination of suitable microspore stage and callus induction from anthers of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.). Sci World J 2014:284342. doi:10.1155/2014/284342  

14. Maluszynski M, Kasha KJ, Szarejko I (2003) Published doubled haploid protocols in plant species. In M Maluszynski, KJ Kasha, BP  

15. Forster, I Szarejko, eds, Doubled haploid production in crop plants: A manual. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 309-335.doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1293-4_46  

16. Moens PB (1964) A new interpretation of meiotic prophase in Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato). Chromosoma 15:231-242.doi:10.1007/bf00321508  

17. Motallebi-Azar A (2010) Androgenic response of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) lines and their hybrids to anther culture.Russ Agric Sci 36:250-258. doi:10.3103/s1068367410040087  

18. Olszewska D, Kisiala A, Niklas-Nowak A, Nowaczyk P (2014) Study of in vitro anther culture in selected genotypes of genus Capsicum.Turk J Biol 38:118-124. doi:10.3906/biy-1307-50  

19. Pok P, Oh EU, Yi K, Kang JH, Ko BY, Kim HB, Song KJ (2015) Characterization of microspore development and pollen tube growth response to self and cross-pollination in Jeju old local citrus species. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 56:225-232. doi:10.1007/s13580- 015-0133-y  

20. Seguí-Simarro JM, Corral-Martínez P, Parra-Vega V, González-García B (2011) Androgenesis in recalcitrant solanaceous crops. Plant Cell Rep 30:765-778. doi:10.1007/s00299-010-0984-8  

21. Seguí-Simarro JM, Nuez F (2005) Meiotic metaphase I to telophase II as the most responsive stage during microspore development for callus induction in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) anther cultures. Acta Physiol Plant 27:675-685. doi:10.1007/s11738-005-0071-x   

22. Seguí-Simarro JM, Nuez F (2007) Embryogenesis induction, callogenesis, and plant regeneration by in vitro culture of tomato isolated microspores and whole anthers. J Exp Bot 58:1119-1132. doi:10.1093/jxb/erl271  

23. Shtereva LA, Zagorska NA, Dimitrov BD, Kruleva MM, Oanh HK (1998) Induced androgenesis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). II. Factors affecting induction of androgenesis. Plant Cell Rep 18:312-317. doi:10.1007/s002990050578  

24. Snape J (1989) Doubled haploid breeding: theoretical basis and practical applications. In Review of advances in plant biotechnology.2nd Int. Symposium Genetic Manipulation in Crops. International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center and International Rice   

25. Research Institute (CIMMYT and IRRI), Manila, The Philippines, pp 19-30  

26. Sood S, Dwivedi S, Reddy TV, Prasanna PS, Sharma N (2013) Improving androgenesis-mediated doubled haploid production efficiency of FCV tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) through in vitro colchicine application. Plant Breed 132:764-771. doi:10.1111/pbr.12114  

27. Summers WL, Jaramillo J, Bailey T (1992) Microspore developmental stage and anther length influence the induction of tomato anther callus. HortScience 27:838-840  

28. Tang K, Sun X, He Y, Zhang Z (1998) Anther culture response of wild Oryza species. Plant Breed 117:443-446. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1998.tb01970.x  

29. Zagorska NA, Shtereva A, Dimitrov BD, Kruleva MM (1998) Induced androgenesis in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) I.Influence of genotype on androgenetic ability. Plant Cell Rep 17:968-973. doi:10.1007/s002990050519  

30. Zhang C, Tsukuni T, Ikeda M, Sato M, Okada H, Ohashi Y, Matsuno H, Yamamoto T, Wada M, et al (2013) Effects of the microspore development stage and cold pre-treatment of flower buds on embryo induction in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) anther culture. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 82:114-124. doi:10.2503/jjshs1.82.114