Article | . 2017 Vol. 35, Issue. 3
Quality Changes in Tomato Fruits Caused by Genotype and Environment Interactions



Hyundai Seed Co. Ltd1
Department of Crop Science, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University2
Department of Biosource Engineering, College of Life Sciences,S ejong University3




2017.. 361:372


PDF XML




Bred and grown around the world, tomato (Solanum spp.) has highly valuable fruits containings various anti-oxidants such as lycopene, flavonoids, glutamine, and β-carotene. Several studies have explored, way in which to enhance the growth, management and quality of tomato, we focus on the management of growth for yield rather than quality. The expression of superior agronomic traits depends on where cultivars are grown. We evaluated 10 cultivars grown in three environment for their lycopene. HTL3137 (70.48 mg·kg-1), which was grown in Yoeju in spring/summer, contained the highest lycopene content, while HTL10256 (20.9 mg·kg-1), which was grown in Suwon in spring/summer, contain the least lycopene.Correlations between color components and lycopene content varied according to growing location and season. In spring/summer-grown tomatoes from Suwon, no significant correlation was observed between any color component (redness [R], greenness [G], blueness [B], luminosity, L*, a*, b*, hue and chroma) and lycopene content. A correlation was observed between B and lycopene content in tomatoes grown in Yeoju during the same season. In tomatoes grown in Yeoju in fall/winter, significant correlations were found between lycopene content and G, luminosity, L*, and hue. Variance in interactions between genotype, environment, and genotype × environment (G × E) using Minimum Norm Quadratic Unbiased Estimate (MINQUE) analysis indicated that lycopene content depends on genotype (51.33%), environment (49.13%), and G × E (21.43%). However, when the Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) was used, the G × E value was highest.



1. Beecher GR (1998) Nutrient content of tomato and tomato products. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 218:98-100. https:// doi.org/10.3181/00379727-218-44282a  

2. Bhandari, SR, Cho, MC, Lee, JG (2016) Genotypic variation in carotenoid, ascorbic acid, total phenolic, and flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activity in selected tomato breeding lines. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 57, 440-452. https://10.1007/s13580-016-0144-3  

3. Bouma J, Varallyay G, Bates NH (1998) Principal land use changes anticipated in Europe. Agric Ecosyst Environ 67:103-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00109-6  

4. Brandt S, Pė k Z, Baran (2006) Lycopene content and colour of ripening tomatoes as affected by environmental conditions. J Sci Food Agric 86:568-572. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2390  

5. Clinton S. K (2006) Lycopene: chemistry, biology, and implications for human health and disease. Nurition Rev. 56:35-51. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1998.tb01691.x  

6. D’Souza M, Singha S, Ingle M (1992) Lycopene concentration of tomato fruit can be estimated from chromaticity values. HortScience. 27:465-466  

7. FAO (2013) FAO Stactical Databases of Agrculture. Available via http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E Accessed 28 August 2016  

8. Gail H, Sofia LC (2003) Tomato-A guide to the pleasure of choosing, growing, and cooking. DK Publishing. pp. 6.  

9. Galiana-Balaguer L, Roselló S, Herrero-Martinez JM, Maquieira A, Nuez F (2001) Determination of -ascorbic acid in Lycopersicon fruits by capillary zone electrophoresis. Anal Biochem. 296:163–218. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.2001.5297  

10. Kuti O, Konuru HB (2005) Effects of genotype and cultivation environment on lycopene content in re-ripe tomatoes. J Sci Food Agric. 85:2021-2026. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2205  

11. Mayne ST (1996) Beta-carotene, carotenoids and disease prevention in humans. FASEBJ 10:690-701  

12. Menrad K (2003) Market and marketing of functional food in Europe. J Food Eng. 56:181-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00247-9  

13. Miller RG (1974) The jackknife: a review. Biometrika. 61:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/61.1.1  

14. Radzevičius A, Karklelienė R, Viškelis P, Bobinas Č, Bobinaitė R, Sakalauskienė S. (2009) Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruit quality and physiological parameters at different ripening stages of Lithuanian cultivars. Agron Res. 7:S712-S718  

15. Jaymie S, Gustavo R, Itai N, Josh T, Atticus J, Audrey D, Jack H, Nancy D, Simon G et al. (2010) Tomato Analyzer Color Test User Manual Version 3. Available via http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/vanderknaap/files/Color_Test_3.0_Manual.pdf Accessed 28 August 2016  

16. Wayne W. Fish, Penelope Perkins-Veazie, Julie K. Collins (2002) A Quantitative Assay for Lycopene That Utilizes Reduced Volumes of Organic Solvents, Jourrnal of Food composition and Analysis. 15:309–317  

17. Watada A, Norris K, Worthington J, Massie D (1976) Estimation of chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of whole tomato by light absorbance technique. J. Food Sci. 41: 329-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1976.tb00611.x  

18. Yan W, Rajcan I (2002) Biplot evaluation of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario. Crop Science 42:11–20. https:// doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.0011  

19. Zhu J, Weir BS (1996) Diallel analysis for sex-linked and maternal effects. Theor Appl Genet. 92:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00222944