Article | 8. 2016 Vol. 34, Issue. 4
Yield Response of Chinese Cabbage to Compost, Gypsum, and Phosphate Treatments under the Saline-sodic Soil Conditions of Reclaimed Tidal Land



Department of Bio-environmental Chemistry, Wonkwang University1
Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Seoul National University2
Institute of Life Science and Natural Resources, Wonkwang University3




2016.8. 587:595


PDF XML




Salt stress in crops in reclaimed tidal lands can be reduced by applying soil amendments. To evaluate the effects of compost, gypsum, and phosphate on the growth of Chinese cabbage in saline-sodic soil conditions, we conducted a pot experiment in 2013 and 2014. The treatments consisted of a standard fertilizer application of a mix of compost and N-P-K fertilizer (S) and standard fertilizer applications with additional compost (S + C), gypsum (S + G), phosphate (S+P), and gypsum and phosphate (S + GP). The mean dry matter yield of cabbage in 2014 was three times as great as that in 2013, although soil EC (Electrical conductivity) in 2014 was not decreased. However, the mean ratio of sodium ion in soil solution (SAR1:5) significantly decreased from 17.3 ± 1.1 in 2013 to 11.2 ± 2.7 in 2014. Application of gypsum had the greatest positive impact on the growth of Chinese cabbage. The S + G treatment increased dry matter yield by 7.0 (48.2) and 7.9 g/plant (16.6%) in 2013 and 2014, respectively, compared to the S treatment. Applying gypsum increased soil EC, but decreased SAR1:5 by 14 and 38% in 2013 and 2014, respectively. The application of compost and phosphate had a small effect on the growth of Chinese cabbage. These results suggest that applying gypsum in reclaimed tidal lands can reduce the sodicity of the soil and improve crop growth.



1. Blum J, Caires EF, Ayub RA, Da Fonseca AF, Sozim M, Fauate M (2011) Soil chemical attributes and grape yield as affected by gypsum application in southern Brazil. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 42:1434-1446. doi:10.1080/00103624.2011.577861  

2. Chen L, Dick WA (2011) Gypsum as an agricultural amendment: general use quidelines. Bulletin, 945. Ohio State University Extention,Columbus, OH, pp 5-17  

3. Choi JS (2007) Nitrogen removal from tidal marsh soils as affected by soil salinity and the presence of organic carbon source. Thesis for degree of Master. Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea  

4. Choudhary OP, Josan AS, Bajwa MS, Kapur ML (2004) Effect of sustained sodic and saline-sodic irrigation and application of gypsum and farmyard manure on yield and quality of sugarcane under semi-arid conditions. Field Crops Res 87:103-116. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2003.10.001  

5. Choudhary OP, Ghuman BS, Singh B, Thuy N, Buresh RJ (2011) Effects of long-term use of sodic water irrigation, amendments and crop residues on soil properties and crop yields in rice-wheat cropping system in a calcareous soil. Field Crops Res 121:373-372. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.01.004  

6. Kim JS, Hyun TK (2011). Effect of NaCl stress on the growth, antioxidant materials, and inorganic ion content in head lettuce seedlings. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 29:433-440  

7. Kim JS, Shim IS, Kim MJ (2010) Physiological response of Chinese cabbage to salt stress. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 28:343-352  

8. Lee JE, Yun SI (2014) Effects of compost and gypsum on soil water movement and retention of a reclaimed tidal land. Korean J Soil Sci Fert 47:340-344. doi:10.7745/kjssf.2014.47.5.340  

9. Lee JE, Seo DH, Yun SI (2015) Salt removal in a reclaimed tidal land soil with gypsum, compost, and phosphate amendment. Korean J Soil Sci Fert 48:326-331. doi:10.7745/kjssf.2015.48.5.326  

10. Munns R, Termaat A (1986) Whole-plant responses to salinity. Aust J Plant Physiol 13:143-160. doi:10.1071/PP9860143  

11. Munns R (2002) Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ 25:239-250. doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x  

12. Rasouli F, Pouya AK, Karimian N (2013) Wheat yield and physico-chemical properties of a sodic soil from semi-arid area of Iran as affected by applied gypsum. Geoderma 193-194:246-355. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.10.001  

13. Ro HM, Yun SI, Choi WJ (2005) Biomass production and N uptake of Chinese cabbages as affected by N rates under elevated atmospheric CO2 and temperature. J Kor Soc Hort Sci 46:126-131  

14. Scherer HW (2001) Sulfur in crop production. Eur J Agron 14:81-111. doi:10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00082-4  

15. Setia R, Marschner P, Baldock J, Chittleborough D, Smith P, smith J (2011) Salinity effects on carbon mineralization in soils of varying texture.   

16. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1908-1916. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.05.013  

17. Yaduvanshi NPS, Sharma DR (2008) Tillage and residual organic manures/chemical amendment effects on soil organic matter and yield of wheat under sodic water irrigation. Soil Tillage Res 98:11-16. doi:10.1016/j.still.2007.09.010  

18. Yun SI, Ro HM (2009) Natural 15 N abundance of plant and soil inorganic-N as evidence for over-fertilization with compost. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1541-1547. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.04.014  

19. Yun SI, Ro HM (2014) Can nitrogen isotope fractionation reveal ammonia oxidation response to varying soil moisture?. Soil Biol Biochem 76:136-139. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.032  

20. Yun SI, Ro HM, Choi WJ, Han GH (2011) Interpreting the temperature-induced response of ammonia oxidizing microorganisms in soil using nitrogen isotope fractionation. J Soils Sediments 11:1253-1261. doi:10.1007/s11368-011-0380-1  

21. Yun SI, Ro HM, Choi WJ, Chang SX (2006) Interactive effects of N fertilizer source and timing of fertilization leave specific N isotopic signatures in Chinese cabbage and soil. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1682-1689. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.11.022  

22. Yun SY, Shin JD (2011) Effects of TLB Microbial fertilizer application on soil chemical properties, microbial flora and growth of Chinese cabbage. Korean J Soil Sci Fert 34:8-16  

23. Zia MH, Ghafoor A, Saifullah, Boers ThM (2006) Comparison of sulfurous acid generator and alternate amendments to improve the quality of saline-sodic water for sustainable rice yields. Paddy Water Environ 4:153-162. doi:10.1007/s10333-006-0043-9