Article | 08. 2015 Vol. 33, Issue. 4
Comparison of Fruit Development and Quality Indices According to Blossom Thinning on Early-season ‘Hanareum’ and Mid-season ‘Niitaka’ Pears



Pear Research Institute, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science1
Department of Horticulture, Chungnam National University2
Cheonan-Si Agricultural Technology Center3




2015.08. 486:491


PDF XML




In this study, we evaluated the differences in fruit development and quality indices of fruits subjected to blossom thinning before full bloom in ‘Hanareum’ and ‘Niitaka’ pears (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai). We carried out a thinning treatments at 5 days before full bloom, targeting the blossoms at the 1st and 2nd position (T1) or the blossoms at the 6th and 7th position (T2) from the basal part of the flower cluster in both cultivars. Blossom thinning treatments increased the average fruit weight of early-season Asian pear ‘Hanareum’ up to 10.5% (T1) and 11.0% (T2) at harvest time (110 days after full bloom). The mid-season ‘Niitaka’ pear showed increased fruit weight of up to 12.6% (T1) and 16.8% (T2) at harvest time (170 days after full bloom). Moreover, these treatments increased the production rate of bigger sized fruits in both cultivars. Removal of blooms also affected fruit quality indices; the bloom-thinned fruits showed higher soluble solids contents (about 1oBrix) and higher skin color redness (a*) especially in ‘Niitaka’ pears when compared to the non-thinned controls. Overall, the treatments increased the fruit size and weight as well as fruit quality including soluble solids and skin color. Bloom thinning treatment targeting the 6th to 7th blossom from the basal part of the flower cluster may be recommended as the practical thinning method in Asian pear ‘Hanareum’ and ‘Niitaka’.



1. Cho, K.H. and T.M. Yoon. 2006. Fruit quality, yield, and profitability of ‘Hongro’ apple as affected by crop load. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 24:210-215.  

2. Hayashi, S. 1960. The pear. Asakura Shoten. Tokyo. Japan.  

3. Hayashi, S. and K. Tanabe. 2002. Fundamental of fruit production. JA, Tottori, Japan.   

4. Hwang, H.S., I.S. Shin, W.C. Kim, Y.U. Shin, J.H. Hwang, and S.S. Hong. 2005. Breeding of good quality, large size, and early summer season pear cultivar ‘Hanareum’ (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai). Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 23:60-63.   

5. Irene, G.P., J. Val, and A. Blanco. 2001. The inhibition of flower bud differentiation in ‘Crimson Gold’ nectarine with GA as an alternative to hand thinning. Sci. Hortic. 90:265-278.  

6. Kaneko, T. and H. Sakamoto. 1977. Study for chemical thinning in pear fruit. Chapt. 1. Chemical thinning of ‘Chojuuro’ pear. Agr. Res. Rep. in Tochigi Pref. 23:71-84.  

7. Kim, J. H. 2001. Recent pear cultivation. Osung books, Seoul, Korea.  

8. Kim, K.Y., M.D. Cho, J.K. Kim, S.B. Kim, and B.W. Moon. 1988. Effects of ethephon application on the fruit thinning in pears (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai). J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 29:13-19.  

9. Kim, J.K., K.Y. Oh, U.G. Lee, K.B. Ma, Y.S. Hwang, J.M. Choi, and J.P. Chun. 2011. Changes of the fruit quality according to temperature environment and marketing period during simulated exportation in ‘Whasan’ pears. J. Bio-Environ. Control 20:399-405.  

10. KOSTAT. 2012. http://www.kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/  

11. Lee, U.Y., K.Y. Oh, H.K. Shim, H.J. Lee, Y.S. Hwang, and J.P. Chun. 2010. Comparison of fruit quality among fruits set on various position within cluster in ‘Niitaka’ pears. J. Agri. Sci. 37:13-18.   

12. McArtney, S. and G. Wells. 1995. Chemical thinning of Asian and European pear with ethephon and NAA. New Zealand J. Crop Hort. Sci. 23:73-84.  

13. Oh, K.Y., U.Y. Lee, S.J. Moon, Y.O. Kim, H.S. Yook, Y.S. Hwang, and J.P. Chun. 2010. Transportation and Distribution temperature affect fruit quality and physiological disorders in ‘Wonhwang’ pears. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 28:434-441.  

14. Ohkawa, K., N. Shiraishi, H. Ohara, and H. Matsui. 2006. Flower thinning effect of ethephon on several Japanese pear cultivars. Hortic. Res. Japan 5:69-73.