Article | 04. 2015 Vol. 33, Issue. 2
Effect of Mixed Liquid Fertilization on Growth Responses of Cherry Tomatoes and Soil Chemical Properties

Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University1
Nature and people Co. Ltd.2
Department of Applied Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chonnam National University3
Department of Biology, Kunsan National University4
Department of Environmental Engineering, Kunsan National University5

2015.04. 268:275


We evaluated the effect of mixed liquid fertilizer (MLF) on growth responses of plants and soil chemical properties. To do so, a pot experiment with cherry tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum var. cerasiforme) using loam soil was conducted for 81 days in a temperature-controlled glasshouse, and four N fertilization treatments were laid out in a completely randomized design with three replicates: control (C), chemical fertilizer treatment (CF), and two rates (MLF-0.5 and MLF-1.0) of MLF treatment. Soils were periodically sampled and analyzed for pH, EC, total N, inorganic N and total C, and growth characteristics of cherry tomatoes were measured. During the experimental periods, the pH of MLF soils was higher than that of CF soils. Soil total-N content increased right after CF-application and ultimately decreased to the level of the control (C) soil, while MLF-application slightly increased the level of soil total-N and this level remained unchanged throughout the experiment. The levels of soil inorganic N content increased after application of CF or MLF, but the initial increase disappeared in 56 days after transplanting (DAT). The dry weight of shoots and roots increased in CF or MLF plants, while the number of fruit increased only in MLF plants. Whereas soluble solid contents were higher in MLF plants than in the other (C and CF) plants, the titratable acidity was not different among treatments. However, no consistent effect of N treatments on major elements of the organs of cherry tomatoes was found. The amounts of N taken up by plants were 0.91 g for CF, 0.61 g for MLF-1.0, 0.43 g for MLF-0.5, and 0.25 g for control treatments, resulting in greater N efficiency for CF than for MLF.

1. Antoniou, P., J. Hamiltion, B. Koopman, R. Jain, B. Holloway, G. Lyberatos, and S.A. Svoronos. 1990. Effect of temperature and pH on the effective maximum specific growth rate of nitrifying bacteria. Water Res. 24:97-101.  

2. Cho, J.K., S.W. Ann, Y.C. Kim, I.S. Hwang, M.S. Kim, J.K. Lee, and H.Y. No. 2010. Effect of seafood amino acid fertilizer and korean effective microorganisms on the leaf quality of Perilla frutescens var. japonica. J. Environ. Sci. 19:1301-1305.  

3. Cho, S.J., Y.S. Lee, S.J. Kim, K.Y. Kim, B.K. Jeong, H.M. Ro, and G.H. Lee. 2012. Identification of cellulolytic bacteria from the grasses by 16S rDNA analysis. Kor. J. of Nature Conservation. 6:49-53.  

4. Choi, J.K. 2008. Effect of liquid pig manure on horticultural crop and soil environment. Annual Rpt. on Natural Cycle Agr. Res. (RDA). Natural Recycle Agr. Res. Project Team. 95-103.  

5. Diacono, M. and F. Montemurro. 2010. Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. A Rev. Agron. for Sustainable Dev. 30:401-422.  

6. Garcia, C., T. Hernandez, and F. Costa. 1992. Variation in some chemical parameters and organic matter in soils regenerated by the addition of municipal solid waste. Environ. Mgt. 16:763-768.  

7. Goeschl, R. and H.K. Lee. 1998. Recent tendency to organic waste treatment in Europe. J. Korea Organ. Resour. Recyl. Assoc. 6:4-14.  

8. Ha, S.M., K.W. Chang, K.P. Han, J.H. Hong, and J.J. Lee. 2005. Changes of physico-chemical properties and maturity assessment during composting of turfgrass clipping types from the golf courses. J. Korea Organ. Resour. Recyl. Assoc. 13:89-99.  

9. Havlin, J.L., J.D. Beaton, S.L. Tisdale, and W.L. Nelson. 2005. Soil fertility and fertilizers. 7 ed. Pearson Educ. NJ. USA. 124.  

10. Hernandez, T., R. Moral, A. Perez-Espinosa, J. Moreno-Caselles, M.D. Perez-Murcia, and C. Garcia. 2002. Nitrogen mineralization potential in calcareous soils amended with sewage sludge, Bioresour. Technol. 83:213-219.  

11. Kang, B.G., H.J. Kim, G.J. Lee, and S.G. Park. 2004. Determination of the optimum application rate of pig slurry for red pepper cultivation. Kor. J. Soil Sci. Fert. 37:388-395.  

12. Kang, H.J., S.H. Yang, and S.C. Lee. 2011. Effects of liquid pig manure on growth of potato, soil chemical properties and infiltration water quality. Kor. J. Soil Sci. Fert. 44:1130-1136  

13. Kaplan, D., R. Wilhelm, and A. Abeliovich. 2000. Interdependent environmental factors controlling nitrification in waters. Water Sci. Technol. 42:167-172.  

14. Kim, E.Y., B.J. Park, and M.M. Oh. 2013. Availability of Slurry Composting and Biofiltration for Cultivation of Cherry Tomato. Protected Hort. and Plant Factory. 22:385-391.  

15. Kim, Y.S., S.K. Ham, T.S. Kim, and H.S. Jeong. 2008. Effect of liquid fertilizer containing medium of Lactobacillus confuse and Pichia anomala on growth in creeping Bentgrass. Kor. Turfgrass Sci. 22:185-196.  

16. Lee, J.T., I.J. Ha, H.D. Kim, J.S. Moon, W.I. Kim, and W.D. Song. 2006. Effect of liquid pig manure on growth, nutrient uptake of onion, and chemical properties in soil. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 24:148-156.  

17. Lee, S.B., K.M. Cho, C.H. Yang, Y.J. Oh, T.I. Park, and K.J. Kim. 2011. Effects of split application of SCB liquid fertilizer on rice yield and soil chemical property in honam plain field. Kor. J. Crop Sci. 56:140-145.  

18. Lee, S.K. 2012. Effects of liquid fertilizer produced from fermented clippings for Kentucky bluegrass. Asian J. Turfgrass Sci. 26:67-71.  

19. Lee, T.K., J.S. Park, M.J. Lee, J.S. Kim, H.M. Ro, S.J. Kim, S.W. Jeon, S.G. Seo, K.Y. Kim, G.H. Lee, and B.G. Jeong. 2012. Variation Patterns in Concentration of Inorganic Nitrogen from Liquid Grass Fertilizer during Aerobic Incubation. Kor. J. Soil Sci. Fert. 45:1120-1125.  

20. Naing, K.W., M. Anees, X.H. Nguyen, Y.S. Lee, S.W. Jeon, S.J. Kim, M.H. Kim, and K.Y. Kim. 2014. Biocontrol of Late Blight Disease (Phytophthora capsici) of Pepper and the Plant Growth Promotion by Paenibacillus ehimensis KWN38. J. of Phytopathol. 162:367-376.  

21. NIAST (National Institute Agricultural Science & Technology). 2000. The methods of soil and plant analysis. Natl. Inst. Agr. Sci. and Technol. Suwon, Korea. 103-146.  

22. Papadopopoulos, I. 1986. Nitrogen fertigation of greenhouse-grown cucumber. Plant and Soil. 93:87-93.  

23. Park, J.M., T.J. Lim, S.B. Kang, I.B. Lee, and Y.I. Kang. 2010. Effect of pig slurry fertigation on soil chemical properties and yield of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Kor. J. Soil Sci. Fert. 43:610-615.  

24. Park, J.M., T.J. Lim, S.E. Lee, and I.B. Lee. 2011. Effect of pig slurry fertigation on soil chemical properties and growth and development of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Kor. J. Soil Sci. Fert. 44:194-199.  

25. Park, J.M., T.J. Lim, and S.E. Lee. 2012. Effect of Pig Slurry Application on the Mineral Content of Leaf, Fruit Quality and Soil Chemical Properties in Pear Orchard. Kor. J. Soil Sci. Fert. 45:209-214.  

26. Ro, H.M., H.J. Choi, S.I. Yun, M.J. Lee, J.M. Kim, H.L. Choi, and K. Zhu. 2008a. Growth of Chinese cabbage and losses of non-point sources from runoff and leaching in soils as affected by anaerobically digested liquid pig slurry. Kor. J. Soil Sci. Fert. 41:112-117.  

27. Ro, H.M., L.S. Kim, M.J. Lee, H.J. Choi, and C.H. Park. 2008b. Soil moisture regime affects variation patterns in concentration of inorganic nitrogen from liquid swine manure during aerobic incubation, Kor. J. Soil Sci. Fert. 41:34-37.  

28. Verkleij, F.N. 1992. Seaweed extracts in agriculture and horticulture: a Review. Biol. Agr. Hortic. 8:309-324.  

29. Yadav, R.L., B.S. Dwivedi, and P.S. Pandey. 2000. Yield trend and changes in soil organic-C and available NPK in a longterm rice-wheat system under integrated use of manure and fertilizer. Field Crops. Res. 68:219-246.  

30. Yamada, K. and H.L. Xu. 2001. Properties and applications of an organic fertilizer inoculated with effective microorganisms. J. Crop Prod. 3(1):255-268.