Article | 04. 2015 Vol. 33, Issue. 2
Bud Development and Bud Break Characteristics in Water Cuttings of ‘Campbell Early’ Grapevine during Dormancy



Department of Integrative Plant Science, School of Bioresource and Bioscience, Chung-Ang University1
Fruit Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science (NIHHS), Rural Development Administration (RDA)2




2015.04. 202:209


PDF XML




In this study, we investigated the cumulative effect of low temperature on bud dormancy release and bud break characteristics in ‘Campbell Early’ grapevine (Vitis labruscana B.) cuttings grown in water culture. Additionally, we observed the development of buds while exposed to low temperatures in an attempt to improve our understanding of dormancy and bud break. The shoots were collected 120 days after full bloom (DAFB; leaf abscission period), and the accumulated chill unit (CU) value was calculated by reducing the temperature to 7.2°C at 125 DAFB. The rate of bud break was 100% in shoots collected at 150 DAFB, The period until the first bud break was two times longer than in the shoots collected 165 DAFB, and bud break speed was significantly reduced. These results indicate that buds are released from endodormancy after 165 DAFB, because at this point the bud break was complete (bud break rate 100%) and it occurred in a very short time period. During this period, when the low-temperature accumulated value was 321h and 442CU according to the CH and Utah models, respectively. Furthermore, the survival rate of main buds decreased rapidly after 165 DAFB, and survival rate of accessory buds was maintained at more than 90% without seasonal differences. The rate of flower bud formation of main buds was much higher than in accessory buds (1:0.23) before the release from endodormancy at 150 DAFB. The final ratio of accessory buds to main buds was high, 1:1.54, at 255 DAFB. Correlation analysis of each investigated factor revealed that bud survival rate and bud formation rate were related only for the main buds, and there was a close relationship between the survival rate of main bud and time. In addition, the survival rate of main buds was positively correlated to the rate of flower bud formation.



1. Alburqureque, A., F. Garcia-Montiel, A. Carrillo, and L. Burgos. 2008. Chilling and heat requirements of sweet cherry cultivars and the relationship between altitude and the probability of satisfying the chill requirements. Environ. Exp. Bot. 64:162-170.  

2. Andreini, L., R. Vrri, and G. Scalabrelli. 2009. Study on the morphological evolution of bud break in Vitis vinifera L. Vitis 48:153-158.  

3. Balandier, P., M. Bonhomme, R. Rageau, F. Capitan, and E. Parisot. 1993. Leaf bud endodormancy release in peach trees: evaluation of temperature models in temperate and tropical climate. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 67:95-113.  

4. Baldocchi, D. and S. Wong. 2008. Accumulated winter chill is decreasing in the fruit growing regions of California. Clim. Change 87:153-166.  

5. Chandler, W.H. 1942. Deciduous orchards. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia.   

6. Choi, I.M., C.H. Lee, Y.P. Hong, and H.S. Park. 2007. Relation between shoot vigour and bud necrosis in ‘Campbell Early’ grapevines. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 25:375-381.  

7. Dokoozlian, N.K. 1999. Chilling temperature and duration interact on the budbreak of ‘Perlette’ grapevines cuttings. HortScience 34:1-3.  

8. Jung, J.E., H.C. Seo, U. Chung, and J.I. Yun. 2006. Spring phenology of a grapevine cultivar under the changing climate in Korea during 1921-2000. Kor. J. Agr. For. Meteorol. 8: 116-124.  

9. Kim, E.J., B.H.N. Lee, Y.H. Kwon, K.H. Shin, K.H. Chung, S.J. Park, and H.S. Park. 2011. Bud necrosis characteristics of ‘Hongisul’ grape. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 29:407-412.  

10. Kwon, E.Y., G.C. Song, and J.I. Yun. 2005. Prediction of dormancy release and bud burst in Korean grapevine cultivars using daily temperature data. Kor. J. Agr. For. Meteorol. 7:185-191.  

11. Kwon, Y.H., E.J. Kim, S.J. Park, H.C. Lee, K.B. Ma, and H.S. Park. 2011. Axillary bud development and necrosis for ‘Heukgoosul’ grapevine. J. Bio-Environ. Cont. 20:382-386.    

12. Lavee, S. and P. May. 1997. Dormancy of grapevine buds - facts and speculation. Austral. J. Grape Wine Res. 3:31-46.  

13. Lavee, S., H. Melamud, M. Zia, anpered, and Z. Bernstein. 1981. Necrosis in grapevine buds (Vitis vinifera cv. Queen of Vineyard) 1. Relation to vegetative vigor. Vitis 20:8-14.  

14. Lavee, S., Y. Shulman, and G. Nir. 1984. The effect of cyanamide on budbreak of grapevines Vitis vinifera L. 17-29. In: R.J. Weaver (ed.). Proc. of Symp. on bud dormancy in grapevine.  

15. Luedeling, E. and P.H. Brown. 2011. A global analysis of the comparability of winter chill models for fruit and nut trees. Int. Biometeorol. 55:411-421.  

16. McColl, C.R. 1986. Cyanamide advances the maturity of table grapes in central Australia. Austral. J. Expt. Agr. 26:505-509.   

17. Mohamed, H.B., A. M. Vadel. J.M.C. Geuns, and H. Khemira. 2010. Biochemical change in dormant grapevine shoot tissue in response to chilling: Possible role in dormancy release. Sci. Hortic. 124:440-447.  

18. Perez, F.J. and W. Lira. 2005. Possible role of catalase in post-dormancy bud-break in grapevines. J. Plant Physiol. 162: 301-308.  

19. Pratt, C. 1979. Shoot and bud development during the prebloom period of Vitis. Vitis 18:1-5.  

20. Ramina, A., M. Colauzzi, A. Masia, A. Pitacco, T. Caruso, R. Messina, and G. Scalabrelli. 1995. Hormonal and climatological aspects of dormancy in peach buds. Acta Hortic. 395:35-45.  

21. Rea. R. and E. Eccel. 2006. Phenological models for blooming of apple in a mountainous region. Int. J. Biometeorol. 51:1-16.  

22. Richardson, E.A., S.D. Seeley, and D.R. Walker. 1974. A model for estimating the completion of rest for ‘Redhaven’ and ‘Elberta’ Peach Trees. HortScience. 9:331-332.  

23. Sabry, G.H., H.A. El-helw, and A.S. El-Rahman. 2011. A study on using jasmine oil as a breaking bud dormancy for flame seedless grapevines. Rep. Opin. 3:48-56.  

24. Sagredo, K.X., K.I. Theron, and N.C. Cook. 2005. Effect of mineral oil and hydrogen cyanamide concentration on dormancy breaking in ‘golden deilcious’ apple trees. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil. 22:251-256.  

25. Shulman, Y., G. Nir, L. Fanberstein, and S. Lavee. 1983. The effect of cyanamide on the release from dormancy of grapevine buds. Sci. Hortic. 19:97-104.  

26. Terzo-Martinez, M.A., J.A. Orozco, G. Almaguer-Vargas, E. Carvajal-Millan, and A.A. Gardea. 2009. Metabolic activity of low chilling grapevine buds forced to break. Thermochim. Acta 481:28-31.  

27. Vasudevan, L., T.K. Wolf, G.G. Welbaum, and M.E. Wisniewski. 1998. Anatomical developments and effects of artificial shade on bud necrosis of Riesling grapevines. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 49:429-439.   

28. Weaver, R.J. and K. Iwasaki. 1977. Effect of temperature and length of storage, root growth and termination of bud rest in ‘Zinfandel’ grapes. Amer. J. Enol. Vitic. 28:149-151.