Article | 02. 2015 Vol. 33, Issue. 1
Optimum Crop Load in Different Planting Densities of Adult ‘Fuji’/M.9 Apple Tree for Preventing Biennial Bearing and Stabilizing Tree Vigor

Department of Horticulture, Daegu University1
Institute of Life and Environment, Daegu University2
Department of Horticultural Science, Kyungpook National University3

2015.02. 1:10


This study was conducted in three years (7-9 years after planting) to investigate vegetative growth, yield, fruit quality, and return bloom for optimum crop load based on different planting densities of adult ‘Fuji’/M.9 apple trees. As plant materials, ‘Fuji’/M.9 apple trees planted at 3.5 × 1.5 m (190 trees per 10 a), 3.5 × 1.2 m (238 trees per 10 a), and 3.2 × 1.2 m (260 trees per 10 a) spacing and trained as slender spindles were used. The crop load was assigned to five different object ranges as follows: 55-64, 65-74, 75-84, 85-94, and 95-104 fruit per tree. TCA increment, total shoot growth, return bloom, yield per tree, and yield efficiency tended to increase as planting density decreased, and fruit weight and soluble solid content tended to increase as the object range of crop load decreased. Fruit red color tended to increase as shoot growth decreased. For apple trees planted with 238 trees and 260 trees per 10a, biennial bearing occurred when the crop load was over 85-94 and 75-84 fruits, respectively. However, biennial bearing did not occur when the crop load was 95-104 fruits in apple trees planted with 190 trees per 10a. Accumulated yield tended to increase as planting density and crop load increased, but that of biennial bearing did not show such a difference. Based on our results, optimum crop load recommendations are to set 95-104 fruits per tree in ‘Fuji’/M.9 mature apple trees planted at 190 trees per 10a, 75-84 fruits per tree at 238 trees per 10a, and 65-74 fruits per tree at 260 trees per 10a.

1. Barden J.A and G.H. Neilsen. 2003. Selecting the orchard site, site preparation and orchard planning and establishment, p. 237-265. In: D.C. Ferree and I.J. Warrington (eds.). Apples; botany, production and uses. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, MA, USA.  

2. Barritt, B.H. 1998. Orchard management systems for Fuji apples in Washington state. Compact Fruit Tree. 31:11-13.   

3. Callesen, O. 1993. Influence of apple tree height on yield and fruit quality. Acta Hortic. 349:111-115.  

4. Choi, S.W., D.H. Sagong, Y.Y. Song, and T.M. Yoon. 2009. Optimum crop load of ‘Fuji’/M.9 young apple trees. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 27:547-553.  

5. Claytion-Greene, K.A. 1993. Influence of orchard management system on yield, quality and vegetative characteristics of apple trees. J. Hort. Sci. 68:365-369.  

6. Costa, G., E. Beltrame, P. Eccher, and A. Pianezzola. 1997. High density planted apple orchards: Effects on yield, performance and fruit quality. Acta Hortic. 451:505-511.  

7. Cripps, K.E.L., F. Melville, and H.I. Nicol. 1975. The relationship of Granny Smith apple tree growth and early cropping to planting density and rectangularity. J. Hort. Sci. 50:291-299.  

8. Eccher, T. and G. Granelli. 2006. Fruit quality and yield of different apple cultivars as affected by tree density. Acta Hort. 712:535-540.  

9. Erf, J.A. and J.T.A. Proctor. 1987. Changes in apple leaf water status and vegetative growth as influenced by crop load. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 112:617-620.  

10. Forshey, C.G. and D.A. Elfving. 1989. The relationship between vegetative growth and fruiting in apples. Hort. Rev. 11:229-287.  

11. Giuliani, R., L. Corelli-Grappadelli, and E. Magnanini. 1997. Effects of crop load on apple photosynthetic responses and yield. Acta Hortic. 451:303-311.  

12. Granger, R.L. G.L. Rousselle, and A. Charland. 1986. Effect of planting densities, rootstocks and training systems on the spartan apple cultivar. Acta Hort. 160:105-113.  

13. Hampson, C.R., H.A. Quamme, and R.T. Brounlee. 2002. Canopy growth, yield, and fruit quality of ‘Royal Gala’ apple trees grown for eight years in five tree training systems. HortScience 37:627-631.  

14. Hampson, C.R., F. Kappel, H.A. Quamme, and R.T. Brounlee. 1997. Varying density with constant rectangularity: Effects on apple tree performance and yield in three training systems. Acta Hortic. 451:437-442.  

15. Hudina, M., F. Stampar, and P. Zadravec. 2001. The influence of planting density on sugar and organic acid content in apple (Malus Domestica Borkh.). Acta Hortic. 557:313-319.  

16. Kon, T.M., J.R. Schupp, H.E. Winzeler, and R.P. Marini. 2013. Influence of mechanical thinning treatment on vegetative and reproductive tissue, fruit set, yield, and fruit quality ‘Gala’ apple. HortScience 48:40-46.  

17. Marini, R.P., J.A. Barden, J.A. Cline, R.L. Perry, and T. Robinson. 2002. Effect of apple rootstocks on average ‘Gala’ fruit weight at four locations after adjusting for crop load. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 127:749-753.  

18. Mika, A. and E. Piskor. 1997. Growth and cropping of dwarf ‘Jonagold’ (‘Jonica’) apple trees planted at the density ranged from 2,000 to 10,000 per ha and trained as slender spindle, super spindle and V system. Acta Hort. 451:473-477.  

19. Ogata, R., K. Goto, T. Kunisawa, and R. Harada. 1986. Productivity and fruit quality of four apple cultivars on three different rootstocks and at different planting densities. Acta Hort. 160:97-104.  

20. Palmer, J.W., R. Giulani, and H.M. Adams. 1997. Effect of crop load on fruiting and leaf photosynthesis of ‘Braeburn’/M.26 apple trees. Tree Physiol. 17:741-746.  

21. Park, M.Y. 2004. Studies on establishment of high density orchard system with slender spindle form ‘Fuji’/M.9 apple trees. Ph.D. Diss., Yeungnam Univ., Gyeongsan, Korea.  

22. Park, M.Y., J.K. Park, S.J. Yang, H.H. Han, I.K. Kang, and J.K. Byun. 2008. Proper tree vigor and crop load in high density planting system for ‘Fuji’/M.9 apple trees. J. Bio-Environ. Cont. 17:306-311.  

23. Robinson, T.L. 2003. Apple-orchard planting systems, p. 345-407. In: D.C. Ferree and I.J. Warrington (eds.). Apples; botany, production and uses. CABI Publishing, Cambridge, MA, USA.   

24. Robinson, T.L., A.N. Lakso, and S.G. Carpenter. 1991. Canopy development, yield, and fruit quality of ‘Empire’ and ‘Delicious’ apple trees grown in four orchard production systems for ten years. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116:179-187.  

25. Robinson, T.L., S.A. Hoying, and G.H. Reginato. 2006. The tall spindle apple production system. New York Fruit Quarterly. 14:21-28.  

26. Sansavini, S. and L. Corell-Grappadelli. 1997. Yield and light efficiency for high quality fruit in apple and peach high density planting. Acta Hort. 451:559-568.   

27. Sansavini, S., B. Marangoni, C. Buscaroli, L. Corelli, and G. Tazzari. 1986. The relationship between spacing and rootstock effects in an intensive planting trial of two apple cultivars. Acta Hort. 160:23-37.   

28. Song, J.H., D.H. Kim, B.U. Ryu, B.S. Seo, D.G. Choi, and C.H. Cho. 2009. The study of method for rising tree height on ‘Hongro’ apple. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 27(Suppl. II): 102-103. (Abstr.)  

29. Stover, E., F. Wirth, and T. Robinson. 2001. A method for assessing the relationship between crop load and crop value following fruit thinning. HortScience 36:157-161.  

30. Tustin, D.S., P.M. Hirst, W.M. Cashmore, I.J. Warrington, and C.J. Stanley. 1993. Spacing and rootstock studies with central leader apple canopies in a high vigour environment. Acta Hortic. 349:169-177.  

31. Volz, R.K., I.B. Ferguson, J.H. Bowen, and C.B. Watkins. 1993. Crop load effects on fruit mineral nutrition, maturity, fruiting and tree growth of ‘Cox’s Orange Pippen’ apple. J. Hort. Sci. 68:127-137.  

32. Wagenmakers, P.S and O. Callesen. 1989. Influence of light interception on apple yield and fruit quality related to arrange-ment and tree height. Acta Hort. 243:149-158.  

33. Wagenmakers, P.S and O. Callesen. 1995. Light distribution in apple orchard systems in relation to production and fruit quality. J. Hort. Sci. 70:935-948.  

34. Wang, H. and L. Cheng. 2011. Differential effects of nitrogen supply on skin pigmentation and flesh starch breakdown of ‘Gala’ apple. HortScience 46:1116-1120.  

35. Weber, M.S. 2001. Optimizing the tree density in apple orchards on dwarf rootstocks. Acta Hort. 557:229-234.  

36. Wertheim, S.J. 1985. Productivity and fruit quality of apple in single-row and full-field planting systems. Sci. Hort. 26:191-208.  

37. Wertheim. S.J. 2005. Planting system and tree shape, p. 190-203. In: J. Tromp, J.T. Webster, and S.J. Wertheim. (eds.). Fundamentals of temperate zone tree fruit production. Backhuys publishers, Leiden.  

38. Widmer, A. and C. Krebs. 2001. Influence of planting density and tree form on yield and fruit quality of ‘Golden Delicious’ and ‘Royal Gala’ apples. Acta Hortic. 557:235-242.  

39. Yang, S.J., M.Y. Park, Y.Y. Song, D.H. Sagong, and T.M. Yoon. 2009. Influence of tree height on vegetative growth, productivity, and labour in slender spindle of ‘Fuji’/M.9 apple trees. J. Bio-Environ. Control. 18:492-501.  

40. Yang, S.J., M.Y. Park, Y.Y. Song, D.H. Sagong, and T.M. Yoon. 2010. Evaluation of early productivity of high density ‘Fuji’ apple orchards by planting well-feathered trees/M.9 EMLA. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 28:374-380.  

41. Yoon, T.M., H.S. Park, and D.H. Sagong. 2005. Effect of root pruning on tree growth and fruit quality of ‘Fuji’/M.9 apple trees. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 23:275-281.