Article | 12. 2014 Vol. 32, Issue. 6
Effect of Different Budding Methods and Times on Grafting Success of Walnut

Department of Biotechnology and Physiology of Horticultural Plants, Iranian Academic Center for Education Culture and Research (ACECR)1
Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Arak University2

2014.12. 788:793


Vegetative propagation of walnut is difficult compared with that of other fruit and nut species. The present study assessed three methods of grafting (patch, shield, and chip) at various periods of walnut growth and with different timings of grafting in walnut. Early May was the best time for grafting, at which time the highest success rate was obtained by the patch method (96%), followed by chip-budding (75%), while shield-grafting showed the lowest efficiency (10%). Patch-grafting was also successful (75-80%) in early August and moderately successful in mid-June (51-55%), while the shield and chip methods had no success during these two times (0.00%). Patch-grafting was more efficient and also induced better callus formation and scion growth than the other two methods. The genotypes used did not affect grafting efficiency. The best results were obtained by patch-budding in both tested genotypes. The present findings show the potential value of patch-grafting in early May as a propagation method for walnut for establishment of guidelines for propagation.

1. Achim, G. and I. Botu. 2001. Results in walnut propagation using different methods. Acta Hort. 544:503-509.  

2. Anonymous. 2010. Walnut trade statistics. FAO statistical data. Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations, Roma.  

3. Atefi, J. and M. Mostafavi. 1987. Patch grafting in walnut. J. Seed Plant 23:30-34.  

4. Avanzato, D. 2001. Effect of different hygro-thermic environments on growth of potted walnut grafted seedlings. Acta Hort. 544:459-464.  

5. Avanzato, D. and J. Atefi. 1997. Walnut grafting by heating the graft-point directly in the field. Walnut grafting by heating the graft-point directly in the field. Acta Hort. 442:291-294.  

6. Bayazit, S., Kazan K., S. Gülbitti, V. Çevik, H. Ayanoglu, and A. Ergül. 2007. AFLP analysis of genetic diversity in low chill requiring walnut (Juglans regia L.) genotypes from Hatay, Turkey. Sci. Hortic. 111:394-398.  

7. Ebrahimi, A., K. Vahdati, and E. Fallahi. 2007. Improved success of persian walnut grafting under environmentally controlled conditions. Int. J. Fr. Sci. 6:3-12.  

8. Ebrahimi, A., R. Fatahi, and K. Vahdati. 2008. The effects of environmental conditions, method and time on the success of budding in walnut. J. Hortic. Sci. 39:10-25.  

9. Gandev, S. 2007. Budding and grafting of the walnut (Juglans regia L.) and their effectiveness in Bulgaria. Bulg. J. Agri. Sci. 13:683-689.  

10. Gautman, D.R. 1990. Studies on the winter and summer vegetative propagation techniques of walnut (Juglans regia L.). Acta Hort. 284:27-31.  

11. Germain, E. 1993. The Persian walnut in Iran. Nucis Nswl. 1:5-6.  

12. Germain, E. 1998. Production and economics of nut crops. Advanced course, May 18-29, Adana, Turkey.  

13. Hartmann, H.T., D.E. Kester, F.T. Davies, and R.L. Geneve. 2001. Plant propagation: Principles and practices. 7th ed. Prentice Hall International Inc., NJ.  

14. Karadeniz, T. 2005. Relationships between graft success and climatic values in walnut (Juglans regia L.). J. Central European Agr. 6:631-634.  

15. Kuden, A. and N. Kaska. 1997. Studies on the patch budding of walnuts in different budding periods under subtropical conditions. Acta Hort. 442:299-301.  

16. Leslie, C.A. and G.H. McGranahan. 1998. The origin of walnut, p. 3-7. In: D. Ramos (ed.). Walnut production manual. University of California, DANR Publ., Davis.  

17. Manning, W.E. 1978. The classification within the Juglandaceae. Ann .Missouri Bot. Garden 65:1058-1087.  

18. McGranahan, G.H., A. Charles, C.A. Leslie, H.A. Philips, and A. Dandaker. 1998. Walnut propagation, p. 71-83. In: D. Romos (ed). Walnut production manual. Univ of California, DANR Publ., Davis   

19. Mitrović, M., R. Miletić, M. Lukić, M. Blagojević, and M. Rakićević. 2008. Impact of rootstock on callus formation in walnut grafted in room conditions. J. Pomol. 42:43-47.  

20. Ozkan, Y. and A. Gumus. 2001. Effects of different applications on grafting under controlled conditions of walnut. Acta Hort. 544:515-520.  

21. Ozkan, Y., Y. Edizer, and Y. Akca. 2001. A study on propagation with patch budding of some walnut (Juglans regia L.) cultivars. Acta Hort. 544:521-526.  

22. Papalexandris, K.H. 1982. Grafting of walnut trees with patch budding. Agris 4:1986-1988.  

23. Paunović, M., R. Miletić, M. Mitrović, and D. Janković. 2012. Graft-take success in walnut under controlled conditions and plant development in the nursery. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo. 40:170-176.  

24. Rezaee, R., V. Grigoorian, K. Vahdati, and M. Valizadeh. 2007. Effects on walnut seedling vigor on root pressure, grafting success and scion growth. Iran. J. Hort. Sci. Tech. 8:21-30.  

25. Rongting, X. and D. Pinghai. 1993. A study on the uniting process of walnut grafting and the factors affecting. Acta Hort. 311: 160-170.  

26. Ros, E. and J. Mataix. 2006. Fatty acid composition of nuts- implications for cardiovascular health. Brit. J. Nutr. 96:29-35.  

27. Zima, A.I. 1992. The effect of budding method on the growth and production of walnut trees. Acta Hort. 237:63-68.