Article | 08. 2014 Vol. 32, Issue. 4
Growth and Fruit Characteristics of ‘Cheongsoo’ Grape in Different Trellis Systems



Fruit Research Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science1
Technology Service Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science2
Planning and Coordination Division, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science3
Agricultural Research Center for Climate Change, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science4




2014.08. 427:433


PDF XML




Trellising is an important cultural practice that affects grape quality and yield. Some grape cultivars require different trellising under different climate and soil conditions. To find suitable trellis conditions for grape cultivar ‘Cheongsoo’, we measured growth and fruit characteristics with three different trellis systems: curtain, Geneva double curtain (GDC), and modified T. The maximum light exposure of clusters in the curtain, GDC, modified T trellis systems was 670, 1,654, and 1,649 μmol・m-2・s-1, respectively. However, there was no difference in air temperature among the three trellis systems. Net CO2 assimilation rate at 1,500 μmol・m-2・s-1 light intensity was 13.4, 13.7, and 8.7 μmol・m-2・s-1 in curtain, GDC, and modified T trellis systems, respectively. Trunk cross section area (TCSA) and bud burst rate were not significantly different among the three systems. Shoot number was 31.3, 47.0, and 37.0 in curtain, GDC, and modified T trellis systems, respectively. The shoot length was higher (243.9 cm) in the modified T trellis system than in the single curtain (171.1 cm) and GDC (151.5 cm) systems. Interior leaf number and leaf layer number were higher in the GDC system, in which there are two primary branches, in comparison to the modified T and curtain systems, which utilize one primary branch. Primary leaf area and lateral leaf area were significantly higher in the modified T trellis system in comparison to the GDC system. Berry weight, length and diameter, and total soluble solids were not significantly different among the three trellis systems. However, cluster weight and cluster number per tree were significantly higher in GDC. Titratable acidity was significantly lower in GDC. Collectively, our data suggest that the GDC trellis system is preferable for grape ‘Cheongsoo’ to maintain fruit quality and quantity in Korea.



1. Amerine, M.A. and C.S. Ough. 1976. Analysis of wines and musts. Acribia, Zaragoza, Spain. 158 p.   

2. Bayougian, C.M., P.E. Read, and E. Water-Shea. 2012. Training system effects on sunlight penetration, canopy structure, yield, and fruit characteristics of ‘Frontenac’ grapevine (Vitis spp.). Intl. J. Fruit Sci. 12:402-409.  

3. Crippen, D.D. and J.C. Morrison. 1986. The effects of sun exposure on the compositional development of ‘Carbernet Sauvignon’ berries. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 37:235-242.  

4. Dokoozlian, N.K. and W.M. Kliewer. 1995a. The light environment within grapevine canopies. I. Description and seasonal changes during fruit development. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 46:209-218.  

5. Dokoozlian, N.K. and W.M. Kliewer. 1995b. The light environment within grapevine canopies. II. Influence of leaf area density on fruit zone light environment and some canopy assessment parameters. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 46:219-226.   

6. Gladstone, E.A. and N.K. Dokoozlian. 2003. Influence of leaf area density and trellis/training system on the light microclimate within grapevine canopies. Vitis 42:123-131.  

7. Hedberg, P.R. and J. Raison. 1982. The effect of vine spacing and trellising on yield and fruit quality of Shiraz grapevines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 33:20-30.  

8. Howell, G.S., D.P. Miller, C.E. Edson, and R.K. Striegler. 1991. Influence of training system and pruning severity on yield, vine size, and fruit composition of Vignoles grapevines. Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 42:191-198.   

9. Intrieri, C. and S. Poni. 1993. Intergrated evolution of trellis training systems and machines to improve grape quality and vintage quality of mechanized Italian vineyards. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 46:116-127.  

10. Jackson, J.E. 1980. Light interception and utilization by orchard systems. Hortic. Rev. 2:208-267.  

11. Kim, I.L., Y.L. Piao, Y.S. Hwang, and J.C. Lee. 2002. Effects of synthetic cytokinin, thidiazuron on berry size and quality of ‘Campbell Early’ (Vitis labruscana) grape. J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 41:75-77.  

12. Kim, K., J. Zhao, and J. Ko. 2005. Exploring the Korean wine market. J. Hospitality Tourism Res. 29:20-41.  

13. Kim, S.J., D.J. Yu, T.C. Kim, and H.J. Lee. 2011. Growth and photosynthetic characteristics of blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum cv. Bluecrop) under various shade levels. Sci. Hort. 129:486-492.  

14. Kim, W.S. and S.J. Chung. 2000. Effect of GA, ethephon, girdling and wiring treatment on the berry enlargement and maturity of ‘Himrod’ grape. J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 41:75-77.  

15. Kliewer, W.M. and R.E. Smart. 1989. Canopy manipulation for optimizing vine microclimate, crop yield and composition of grapes, p. 275-291. In: C.J. Wright (ed.). Manipulation of fruiting. Butterworths, London.  

16. Korea Customs Service. 2013. Export and import trade statistics, imported fruit report in the last decade. Korea Customs Service, Daejeon, Korea.  

17. Korean Rural Economic Institute. 2012. Agricultural monitoring service. Agricultural Outlook Center, Korea Rural Economic Institute, Seoul, Korea.  

18. Louarn, G., J. Dauzat, J. Lecoeur, and E. Lebon. 2008. Influence of trellis system and shoot positioning on light interception and distribution in two grapevine cultivars with different architectures: an original approach based on 3D canopy modeling. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 14:143-152.  

19. Morrison, J.C. and A.C. Noble. 1990. The effect of leaf and cluster shading on the composition of Carbetnet Sauvignon grapes and on fruit and wine sensory properties. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 41:193-200.  

20. Reynolds, A.G., D.A. Wardle, M.A. Cliff, and M. King. 2004. Impact of training system and vine spacing on vine performance, berry composition, and wine sensory attributes of Seyval and Chancellor. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 55:84-95.  

21. Reynolds, A.G., R.M. Pool, L.R. Mattick. 1986. Influence of cluster exposure on fruit composition and wine quality of Seyval blanc grapes. Vitis 25:85-95.  

22. Rojas-Lara, E.A. and J.C. Morrison. 1989. Differntial effects of shading fruit or foliage on the development and composition of grape berries. Vitis 28:199-208.  

23. Smart, R. and M. Robinson. 1991. Sunlight into wine. Winetitles, Adelaide.  

24. Wolf, T.K. and M.K. Cook. 1994. Cold hardiness of dormant buds of grape cultivars: Comparison of thermal analysis and field survival. HortScience 29:1453-1455.  

25. Zoecklein, B.W., T.K. Wolf, L. Pelanne, M.K. Miller, and S.S. Birkenmaier. 2008. Effect of vertical shoot-positioned, Smart- Dyson, and Geneva double curtain training systems on Viognier grape and wine composition. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 59:11-21.