Article | 06. 2014 Vol. 32, Issue. 3
Analyses of Transpiration and Growth of Paprika (Capsicum annuum L.) as Affected by Moisture Content of Growing Medium in Rockwool Culture



Department of Plant Science, Seoul National University1
Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University2
Department of Horticultural Science, Chungnam National University3




2014.06. 340:345


PDF XML




Since the moisture content (MC) of growing medium closely related with the crop transpiration, the MC should be included to the environmental factors to be considered for irrigation control in soilless culture. The objective of this study was to analyze the transpiration of paprika plants using daily mean solar radiation (RAD) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) as well as the growth of the plants at different MCs of rockwool growing media. The starting points of irrigation were controlled by a moisture sensor with minimum set points of 40%, 50%, and 60% of MCs. The canopy transpirations were measured for 80 to 120 days after transplanting and analyzed. The transpirations were well regressed with a combination of both RAD and VPD rather than daily mean RAD only under the controlled MCs. The transpiration at 60% MC was higher than those at 50% and 40% MCs. Leaf area, leaf fresh and dry weights at 60% MC were higher than those at 50% and 40% MCs while the number of leaves had no significant difference among the MCs. There were no significant differences in number of fruits and fruit size among all the MCs, while fruit weight was significantly lower at 40% MC than other treatments. Fresh and dry fruit yields were the highest at 60% MC. Therefore it was concluded that the transpiration was affected by the MC of rockwool growing medium and the minimum set point of 50-60% MC of rockwool growing medium gave better effects on the growth of the paprika plants.



1. Abdel-Mawgoud, A.M.R., Y.N. Sassine, Y. Ghora, and E. Heuvlink. 2006. Independent effect of water content in rockwool on water use, growth and production of greenhouse sweet pepper. Euro. J. Sci. Res. 15:235-244.  

2. Adams, P. 1992. Crop nutrition in hydroponics. Acta Hortic. 323: 289-305.  

3. Baas, R. and E. van Rijssel. 2006. Transpiration of glasshouse rose crops: Evaluation of regression models. Acta Hortic. 718:547-556.  

4. Baille, M., A. Baille, and D. Delmon. 1994a. Microclimate and transpiration of greenhouse rose crops. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 71:83-97.  

5. Baille, M., A. Baille, and J.C. Laury. 1994b. A simplified model for predicting evapotranspiration rate of nine ornamental species vs. climate factors and leaf area. Sci. Hortic. 59:217-232.  

6. Chunpin, C., C. Jingcheng, and B. Lin. 2002. Study on simple transpiration model and fitted measurement time for dominant plant at mudstone area in Taiwan. Proc. 12th ISCO Conf. Vol. IV. Index 244.   

7. Costa, L.D. and G. Gianquinto. 2002. Water stress and water table depth influence yield, water use efficiency, and nitrogen recovery in bell pepper: Lysimeter studies. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 53:201-210.  

8. Harmanto, V.M. Salokhe, M.S. Babel, and H.J. Tantau. 2005. Water requirement of drip irrigated tomatoes grown in greenhouse in tropical environment. Agr. Water Manage. 71:225-242.  

9. Hsiao, T.C. 1993. Growth and productivity of crops in relation to water status. Acta Hortic. 335:137-148.  

10. Hsiao, T.C. 2000. Leaf and root growth in relation to water status. HortScience 35:1051-1057.  

11. Jolliet, O. and B.J. Bailey. 1992. The effect of climate on tomato transpiration in greenhouse: Measurements and models comparison. Agr. Forest Meteorol. 58:43-63.  

12. Kirnak, H., T.H. Shorta, and R.C. Hansena. 2002. Studies on the relationships among moisture tension, microclimate and transpiration rate of container grown Acer rubrum. J. Appl. Hortic. 4:65-69.   

13. Medrano, E., P. Lorenzo, M.C.S. Guerrero, and J.I. Montero. 2005. Evaluation and modeling of greenhouse cucumber-crop transpiration under high and low radiation conditions. Sci. Hort. 105:163-175.   

14. Park, J.S., N.H. Tai, T.I. Ahn, and J.E. Son. 2009. Analysis of moisture characteristics in rockwool slabs using time domain reflectometry (TDR) sensors and their applications to paprika cultivation. J. Bio-environ. Control 18:238-243.  

15. Smittle, D.A., W.L. Dickens, and J.R. Stansell. 1994. Irrigation regimes affect yield and water us by bell pepper. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 119:936-939.  

16. Sonnenveld, C. 2002. Composition of nutrient solutions, p. 179-210. In: D. Savvas and H. Passam (eds.). Hydroponic production of vegetables and ornamentals. Embryo, Athens, Greece.  

17. Stanghellini, C. and W.T.M. van Meurs. 1989. Crop transpiration: A greenhouse climate control parameter. Acta Hort. 245:384-388.  

18. Ta, T.H., J.H. Shin, T.I. Ahn, and J.E. Son. 2011. Modelling of transpiration of paprika plants based on radiation and leaf area index in soilless culture. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol. 52:265-269.   

19. Tai, N.H., J.S. Park, T.I. Ahn, J.H. Lee, D.J. Myoung, Y.Y. Cho, and J.E. Son. 2010. Analysis of relationship among growth, environmental factors and transpiration in soilless culture of paprika plants. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 28:59-64.  

20. Tai, N.H., T.H. Ta, T.I. Ahn, J.S. Park, and J.E. Son. 2009. Estimation of leaf area, fresh weight, and dry weight of Paprika (Capsicum annuum L.) using leaf length and width in rockwool- based soilless culture. Hort. Environ. Biotechnol. 50:422-426.   

21. Wang, X., W. Zhang, and X. Liu. 2013. Daily variation in transpiration and water potential of Robinia pseudoacacia. J. Food, Agr. Environ. 11:999-1005.  

22. Zhang, J.B., Z.P. Yan, Q.R. Li, and Y.J. Ye. 2001. Study on the evapotranspiration model for fitted plant in Taiwan mudstone area. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 8:136-145.