Article | . 2014 Vol. 32, Issue. 1
Anatomical Structure and Fruit Quality According to the Fruit Developmental Stage as Affected by Gibberellins Treatments in Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai cv. Hanareum

The Department of Integrative Plant Science, School of Bioresource and Bioscience, Chung-Ang University1
Pear Research Station, National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science2

2014.. 33:40


This study was carried out to understand the physiological characteristics of early-matured ‘Hanareum’ (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) pears through anatomical structure and fruit characteristics and also the changes according to gibberellin (GA) treatment. The pericarp at full bloom consists of outer epidermis, hypodermis, parenchyma cell, and inner epidermis from the exterior and five types of vascular bundle tissues. Cork cell layer was formed at 70 days after full bloom (DAFB) in non-treated fruits and formed at 60 DAFB in GA treated fruits. Cell division period was from full bloom (FB) to 40 DAFB and then fruit enlargement was accomplished by the cell growth. Comparison of the fruit enlargement and fruit structure development by GA treatment or non-treatment showed that cell division of ‘Hanaerum’ fruits did not affect the GA treatment but fruit enlargement was affected cell growth. Fruit stalk of GA treatment fruits was larger than non-treated fruits from 40 DAFB which correspond to the period of the stop of cell division and ‘Hanareum’ was regarded GA treatment expedite of vascular bundle tissue growth and relatively increased nutrient transport to fruit. In addition to, average fruit quality between the non-treatment and GA treatment showed that fruit weight was higher in fruits treated by GA but firmness was lower and probably was effected fruit storing in ‘Hanareum’ pear.

1. Choi, D.G. 2004. Changes of fruit characteristics and storage by gibberellin and polyamine treatment of oriental pear (Pyrus pyrifolia). J. Bio-Environmental Control 13:185-193.  

2. Choi, J.H., J.J. Choi, J.S. Lee, and Y.O. Park. 2009. Effect of gibberellin pasting on the fruit stalks and change of tree condition and pear quality in Niitaka varieties. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 27(Suppl. I):101. (Abstr.)  

3. Esau, K. 1977. Anatomy of seed plants. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Ins., New York. p. 445-448.  

4. Hwang, H.S., I.S. Shin, W.C. Kim, Y.U. Shin, J.H. Hwang, and S.S. Hong. 2005. Breeding of a good quality, large size, and early summer season pear cultivar ‘Hanareum’ (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai). Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 23:60-63.  

5. Kim, H.G., D.G. Choi, D.H. Yoo, and D.C. Choi. 2002. Change of fruit quality by gibberellins and polyamine treatment of pear. Proc. Korean Soc. Biol. Environ. Control Conf. 3:233-240.  

6. Kim, J.H. 1997. Recent pear cultivation. Osung books, Seoul, Korea. p. 213-214.  

7. Park, H.S. 1995. The pericarp of normal and shot berries: Differentiation of the structure and development of some bio-chemical constituents, specieall the tannins (In French). Ph.D. Thesis., Bordeaux I Univ., Bordeaux.  

8. Park, H.S., J.K. Kim, and I.K Yoon. 2002. Characteristics of fruit tissue development and fruit splitting occurrence in ‘Whasan’ pear. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 20:88. (Abstr.)  

9. Youn, C.K., S.K. Kim, S.C. Lim, H.H. Kim, Y.K. Kim, C.H. Lee, and K.S. Choi. 2000. Effects of application time of GA paste on tree and fruit growth and fruit quality of ‘Kamcheonbae’ and ‘Whangkeumbae’ pears. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 18:383-386.  

10. Zhang, C., T. Kenji, T. Fumio, M. Kazuhiro, and Y. Akira. 2005. 13C-phosphate accumulation in Japanese pear fruit during the period of rapid fruit growth in limited by the sink strength of fruit rather than by the transport capacity of the pedicel. J. Experimental Bot. 56:2713-2719.  

11. Zhang, C., T. Kenji, S. Wang, T. Fumio, Y. Akira, and M. Kazuhiro. 2006. The impact of cell division and cell enlargement on the evolution of fruit size in Pyrus Pyrifolia. Ann. Bot. 98:537-543.